But all this seems to be part of a convention strategy of attacking an alternate reality Obama rather than the one who currently resides in the White House. A national convention is a rare opportunity to get your message out to voters unfiltered, and when you spend nearly all of it criticizing the government takeover of health care that didn't happen, the apology tour that didn't happen, the war on religion that didn't happen, etc., and then make the entire convention's theme ("We built it") a response to an out-of-context quote that only works as a gaffe when you selectively edit the president's speech, and when it seems the media is finally willing to call bullshit on this stuff, it makes you look bad. It makes it look like the real Obama must be a brilliant, flawless president -- otherwise, why would you have to make stuff up about him?
Now, even the most ardent Obama fan (even Obama himself, I'll bet) would admit to some flaws over the past 3 1/2 years. Can Republican speechwriters not come up with any? Let me just offer a few suggestions for those still working on some speeches for tonight:
- The economy is still not great! Would it be so hard to say something like, "Yes, Obama inherited a lot of challenges in 2008, but so did Reagan in 1980. By 1984, we had 7% economic growth. Where's the Obama recovery?" I mean, tinker with the wording or whatever, but that's actually true. Is that not enough?
- Solyndra! Yes, it's small potatoes -- just the narrowest sliver of stimulus spending, which overall was well-spent and actually saw good results. But at least with Solyndra, the president took a gamble with taxpayer money and gambled wrong. There must be at least a handful of similar cases out there. Find them.
- Federal judges. I know this is generally a left-wing critique of Obama, and most Republicans are thrilled that there are fewer Obama judges on the bench. But the fact that he hasn't nominated more judges actually is a bit of a scandal. You can spin that to make it look irresponsible, can't you?
- You could attack ACA for what it actually does. It requires people to purchase something they might not have purchased. Yes, it's constitutional, but it seems like you could frame it as inconsistent with the current conservative vision of liberty without blowing it up into some Marxist caricature.
20 comments:
Would it be so hard to say something like, "Yes, Obama inherited a lot of challenges in 2008, but so did Reagan in 1980. By 1984, we had 7% economic growth. Where's the Obama recovery?" I mean, tinker with the wording or whatever, but that's actually true.
Maybe it's technically true, like Ryan attacking the President for not supporting the Bowles-Simpson commission that Ryan himself voted down. But it's not true, even if it's less untrue than the dog-whistle welfare ads.
Aside from an approximately 80-day period between Al Franken finally being sworn in, and Ted Kennedy's passing there was no 'filibuster proof' Senate majority. And that period was full enough of ACA drama.
Any idea of a 'second stimulus' was filibustered by McConnell in the Senate until the midterms, and then made impossible by the Republican house that nearly defaulted on the national debt.
Obama's recovery is largely bottled up in the 95% of his jobs proposals that sit unpassed, and other ideas such as an infrastructure bill. There's been little of an Obama economic recovery program to even judge.
(Now you could make an argument that he won't get any of that out of Republicans in a second term, but the founders didn't set up this government to operate like an English Parliament - people voting against the national interest to advance partisan political goals is still fairly new to America.)
UN PRESIDENT TIM KALEMKARIAN, US PRESIDENT TIM KALEMKARIAN, US SENATE TIM KALEMKARIAN, US HOUSE TIM KALEMKARIAN: BEST MAJOR CANDIDATE.
UN PRESIDENT HUGH HEWITT, US PRESIDNET HUGH HEWITT, US SENATE HUGH HEWITT, US HOUSE HUGH HEWITT, GOVERNOR HUGH HEWITT, LT GOVERNOR HUGH HEWITT: BEST MAJOR CANDIDATE.
UN PRESIDENT MIKE GALLAGHER, US PRESIDENT MIKE GALLAGHER, US SENATE MIKE GALLAGHER, US HOUSE MIKE GALLAGHER: BEST MAJOR CANDIDATE.
Packers And Movers Meerpet
Packers And Movers muthangi
Packers And Movers munganoor
Packers And Movers nadergul
Packers And Movers nagaram
Packers And Movers narepalle
Packers And Movers narsingi
For More Details Please Visit Here :
Packers and Movers Hyderabad @
Packers And Movers Hyderabad
One of the best website I have seen in today
Thanks for such a fantastic blog in here
This is kind of info written in a perfect way
I’m able to bookmark your website online and preserve checking for brand new data.
I am very enjoyed for this blog. Its an informative topic.
Its opportunity are so fantastic and working style so speedy.
I have a lot of spray lining knowledge but always learn something new.
I personally believe that the word “diversity” has multiple definitions
Nice Blog. Thanks for sharing with us. Such amazing information.
splendid beat ! I woul will even enjoy how i feel after analyzing your articl
You put certainly very useful information..
Extraordinary effort to make this blog more super and attractive.
i am actually lo a issue new nowadays! Thank you for that.
I feel this is among the most important info for me. And i am glad reading your article
The site style is perfect, the articles is actually nice :D Good job for this, cheers
Im extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout in your blog
Post a Comment